image description

Chris Sun represents major corporations in complex commercial litigation, class action defense, and intellectual property disputes. He has substantial experience managing all aspects of the litigation process and regularly appears in court, argues motions, and takes depositions to obtain favorable results for his clients.

Chris has played key roles in several cutting-edge and high-stakes matters. He is currently on the team defending OpenAI in landmark copyright lawsuits that will help define the scope of fair use in the context of machine learning. Chris has experience litigating cases addressing the intersection of technology and privacy, most recently defending Google in the In re Google Location History Litigation, a set of consolidated class actions challenging the company’s geolocation data practices, with a proposed settlement currently on appeal before the Ninth Circuit. In the cryptocurrency space, Chris successfully defended Coinbase in an arbitration involving its handling of unsupported digital assets. He argued the motion that won the dismissal of a high-profile copyright case brought by Riot Games against Shanghai Moonton Technology Co., Ltd., in federal court. Chris also helped secure a complete defense verdict in a rare class action trial against Public Storage, defeating more than $150 million in claimed damages.

Chris has an active pro bono practice and was awarded the 2025 California Lawyers and Attorneys of the Year (CLAY) award for securing a government settlement for three immigrant families whose children were taken under the first Trump administration’s family separation policy.

As a former global tax and pricing professional, Chris also has substantial experience with complex economic relationships, corporate organizational structures, and sophisticated financial modeling. A graduate of Harvard Law School, Chris clerked for the Hon. Jill Pryor of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. 

 

Chris Sun represents major corporations in complex commercial litigation, class action defense, and intellectual property disputes. He has substantial experience managing all aspects of the litigation process and regularly appears in court, argues motions, and takes depositions to obtain favorable results for his clients.

Chris has played key roles in several cutting-edge and high-stakes matters. He is currently on the team defending OpenAI in landmark copyright lawsuits that will help define the scope of fair use in the context of machine learning. Chris has experience litigating cases addressing the intersection of technology and privacy, most recently defending Google in the In re Google Location History Litigation, a set of consolidated class actions challenging the company’s geolocation data practices, with a proposed settlement currently on appeal before the Ninth Circuit. In the cryptocurrency space, Chris successfully defended Coinbase in an arbitration involving its handling of unsupported digital assets. He argued the motion that won the dismissal of a high-profile copyright case brought by Riot Games against Shanghai Moonton Technology Co., Ltd., in federal court. Chris also helped secure a complete defense verdict in a rare class action trial against Public Storage, defeating more than $150 million in claimed damages.

Chris has an active pro bono practice and was awarded the 2025 California Lawyers and Attorneys of the Year (CLAY) award for securing a government settlement for three immigrant families whose children were taken under the first Trump administration’s family separation policy.

As a former global tax and pricing professional, Chris also has substantial experience with complex economic relationships, corporate organizational structures, and sophisticated financial modeling. A graduate of Harvard Law School, Chris clerked for the Hon. Jill Pryor of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. 

 

Clay Award Honors Landmark Settlements for Families Separated by Trump-Era Policy

05/07/2025

In a landmark legal victory, three immigrant families have secured sizable settlements from the U.S. government for trauma suffered during family separations at the southern border in 2018. The settlement, announced in November 2024, represents the largest payout among dozens of similar cases nationwide stemming from the controversial Trump-era family separation policy. Read more

Law360 Trials Group Of The Year: Keker, Van Nest & Peters

02/18/2025

Keker, Van Nest & Peters partners Bob Van Nest, Sharif Jacob, Sophie Hood and Ryan Wong reflect on the firm’s biggest trial wins which earned its place among Law360’s 2024 Trials Groups of the Year. Read more

KVP Attorneys Recognized in 2025 Editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America.

08/15/2024

The 2025 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America featured 25 KVP attorneys. Read more

Google Settles AI-Chip Suit That Had Sought $1.6 Billion

01/24/2024

Law360 has reported that Google LLC, represented by Keker, Van Nest & Peters, and Singular Computing LLC have settled a patent lawsuit over computer chip designs that improve efficiency for artificial intelligence and cloud computing. The joint motion to settle the case comes two weeks into a federal jury trial in Massachusetts and as both parties were set to deliver closing arguments. Read more

Keker, Van Nest & Peters Announces New Partners and Of Counsel

01/17/2023

Keker, Van Nest & Peters is pleased to announce that the firm has elevated associates Bailey Heaps, Katie Lynn Joyce, and Chris Sun to Partners, and Kristin Hucek and Ian Kanig to Of Counsel, effective January 1, 2023. Read more

Shanghai Moonton Defeats Riot Games Copyright Lawsuit

11/09/2022

Representing Shanghai Moonton Technology Co., Ltd., Keker, Van Nest & Peters lawyers secured the dismissal of a copyright lawsuit filed by Riot Games, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Read more

'Storage Wars' Star David Hester Just Lost His Court Battle With Public Storage

May 29, 2020

In an opinion Friday, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal found that the reality TV personality now “finds himself at war with defendant Public Storage,” but that Hester lost this most recent breach of contract battle with the global self-storage company. Read more

A Tale of 2 Trials: How These Defense Teams Notched Rare Class Action Verdicts

March 01, 2019

Keker, Van Nest & Peters scored a defense verdict in California this month in the rarest of trials: class actions. Read more

Public Storage Class Kicks Off $100M Trial Over Insurance

January 28, 2019

Public Storage bamboozled storage space renters into believing they were required to buy company provided insurance in order to rent units, customers testified Monday at the start of a class action bench trial in California seeking $100 million in restitution from the national storage giant. Read more

Federal judge rules suit to force California to make all portions of executions public may proceed

August 17, 2018

A federal judge on Friday rejected an attempt by the state of California to dismiss much of a lawsuit that seeks to make public all portions of executions. Read more

Judge refuses to dismiss lawsuit on California executions

August 17, 2018

A federal judge has refused to dismiss a lawsuit by news organizations seeking to let media and public witnesses view more of the process of executions in California, which could resume soon. Read more

LA Times, other CA news media sue state to make entire execution process transparent, but critics say it will prevent executions

April 12, 2018

The LA Times and two San Francisco-based non-profit news organizations are suing to keep executions from resuming in CA. The Times, NPR-member station KQED and the San Francisco Progressive Media Center want guaranteed full access to executions before they resume. Read more

Keker and the ACLU of Northern California Call on State to Allow Full Press Access to Executions

April 11, 2018

Keker, Van Nest & Peters and The American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California filed suit against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation challenging its execution viewing procedure. Read more