Chris Sun represents major corporations in complex commercial litigation, class action defense, and intellectual property disputes. He has substantial experience managing all aspects of the litigation process and regularly appears in court, argues motions, and takes depositions to obtain favorable results for his clients.
Chris has played key roles in several cutting-edge and high-stakes matters. He is currently on the team defending OpenAI in landmark copyright lawsuits that will help define the scope of fair use in the context of machine learning. Chris has experience litigating cases addressing the intersection of technology and privacy, most recently defending Google in the In re Google Location History Litigation, a set of consolidated class actions challenging the company’s geolocation data practices, with a proposed settlement currently on appeal before the Ninth Circuit. In the cryptocurrency space, Chris successfully defended Coinbase in an arbitration involving its handling of unsupported digital assets. He argued the motion that won the dismissal of a high-profile copyright case brought by Riot Games against Shanghai Moonton Technology Co., Ltd., in federal court. Chris also helped secure a complete defense verdict in a rare class action trial against Public Storage, defeating more than $150 million in claimed damages.
Chris has an active pro bono practice and was awarded the 2025 California Lawyers and Attorneys of the Year (CLAY) award for securing a government settlement for three immigrant families whose children were taken under the first Trump administration’s family separation policy.
As a former global tax and pricing professional, Chris also has substantial experience with complex economic relationships, corporate organizational structures, and sophisticated financial modeling. A graduate of Harvard Law School, Chris clerked for the Hon. Jill Pryor of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.
Downey v. Public Storage and Perez v. Public Storage
We defended the United States’ largest self-storage operator, Public Storage, in two class actions filed in California alleging violations of Business & Professions Code Section 17200 and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act. We successfully defeated class certification in the Downey case in May 2018 (and handled the appeal in which that decision was affirmed) and won a complete defense verdict in the Perez case after trial—one of only a handful of class action trials recently conducted in California.
Wilbur P.G. v. USA
We represented three immigrant families intentionally separated by the Trump Administration in 2018. Asserting novel claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, we vigorously pursued the case until the eve of trial, when the government agreed to the largest settlement out of any of the fifty similar cases filed nationwide.
Riot Games v. Shanghai Moonton Technology
We represent Moonton, a Chinese video game developer, in a lawsuit filed by Riot Games asserting claims of copyright and trademark infringement relating to Riot’s League of Legends video game. We filed a motion to dismiss based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens, arguing that Riot should be required to pursue its claims in China because its lawsuit was intertwined with and inconsistent with a pending Chinese lawsuit filed by Riot’s parent company, Tencent. The Court granted the motion and dismissed the lawsuit.
In re: Google Location History Litigation
We are defending Google in consolidated cases on behalf of a worldwide putative class of mobile device users that are challenging Google’s location-data practices. We obtained a dismissal at the pleading stage of all of plaintiffs’ claims, including a dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs’ claims for violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act. Following dismissal with prejudice of what plaintiffs viewed as their most valuable claim, the case subsequently reached a settlement, which we are currently defending on appeal at the Ninth Circuit against objectors’ counsel.
Singular v. Google
We defended Google against an AI-related patent infringement suit brought by Singular Computing that alleged Google’s TPU chips (custom-designed hardware used for training and inference of large AI models) infringed Singular’s patents. After Google successfully invalidated some of the patent claims through inter partes review, the KVP team led Google’s defense in a 2-week trial in Boston federal court on a narrowed set of claims. Shortly before closing arguments, Singular accepted a pending settlement offer.
OpenAI Copyright Cases
OpenAI tapped Keker as lead trial counsel in a series of copyright lawsuits that will establish the boundaries of copyright fair use as applied to generative AI. The cases include claims brought by newspapers, authors, and other media outlets alleging that the training and outputs of Open AI's large language models infringe their works.
05/07/2025
In a landmark legal victory, three immigrant families have secured sizable settlements from the U.S. government for trauma suffered during family separations at the southern border in 2018. The settlement, announced in November 2024, represents the largest payout among dozens of similar cases nationwide stemming from the controversial Trump-era family separation policy. Read more
02/18/2025
Keker, Van Nest & Peters partners Bob Van Nest, Sharif Jacob, Sophie Hood and Ryan Wong reflect on the firm’s biggest trial wins which earned its place among Law360’s 2024 Trials Groups of the Year. Read more
08/15/2024
The 2025 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America featured 25 KVP attorneys. Read more
01/24/2024
Law360 has reported that Google LLC, represented by Keker, Van Nest & Peters, and Singular Computing LLC have settled a patent lawsuit over computer chip designs that improve efficiency for artificial intelligence and cloud computing. The joint motion to settle the case comes two weeks into a federal jury trial in Massachusetts and as both parties were set to deliver closing arguments. Read more
01/17/2023
Keker, Van Nest & Peters is pleased to announce that the firm has elevated associates Bailey Heaps, Katie Lynn Joyce, and Chris Sun to Partners, and Kristin Hucek and Ian Kanig to Of Counsel, effective January 1, 2023. Read more
11/09/2022
Representing Shanghai Moonton Technology Co., Ltd., Keker, Van Nest & Peters lawyers secured the dismissal of a copyright lawsuit filed by Riot Games, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Read more
May 29, 2020
In an opinion Friday, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal found that the reality TV personality now “finds himself at war with defendant Public Storage,” but that Hester lost this most recent breach of contract battle with the global self-storage company. Read more
March 01, 2019
Keker, Van Nest & Peters scored a defense verdict in California this month in the rarest of trials: class actions. Read more
January 28, 2019
Public Storage bamboozled storage space renters into believing they were required to buy company provided insurance in order to rent units, customers testified Monday at the start of a class action bench trial in California seeking $100 million in restitution from the national storage giant. Read more
August 17, 2018
A federal judge on Friday rejected an attempt by the state of California to dismiss much of a lawsuit that seeks to make public all portions of executions. Read more
August 17, 2018
A federal judge has refused to dismiss a lawsuit by news organizations seeking to let media and public witnesses view more of the process of executions in California, which could resume soon. Read more
April 12, 2018
The LA Times and two San Francisco-based non-profit news organizations are suing to keep executions from resuming in CA. The Times, NPR-member station KQED and the San Francisco Progressive Media Center want guaranteed full access to executions before they resume.
Read more
April 11, 2018
Keker, Van Nest & Peters and The American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California filed suit against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation challenging its execution viewing procedure. Read more