image description

Kristen Lovin

Of Counsel and Senior IP & Technology Litigator
Practice Areas

Intellectual Property

Kristen Lovin represents clients in high-stakes litigation encompassing a broad range of intellectual property, data privacy, and licensing disputes. She leverages her computer science and electrical engineering background and over a decade of litigation experience to develop winning liability strategies that are rooted in a deep understanding of her clients’ technology and business. She has litigated cases in California, Delaware, Texas, and the ITC, and is registered to practice before the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.

Kristen has been an active member of several Keker trial teams, including representing Ivantis Inc., the maker of a revolutionary eye stent designed to treat glaucoma, in a case brought by competitor Glaukos Corporation alleging infringement of two of Glaukos’ patents. She served on a team defending Varian Medical Systems, a world leader in radiotherapy medical devices for the treatment of cancer, in the District of Delaware against patent-infringement claims brought by Best Medical International. She has also represented Google against an eight-patent case related to voice detection and microphone arrays against Jawbone, and is defending Google in a five-patent case filed by Wildseed Mobile, which accuses pixel phones, YouTube, Google search and ad targeting. Kristen is also defending Netflix, Inc. in multiple patent suits brought by Broadcom, which involve complex video technologies such as entropy encoding, adaptive streaming, and distributed software deployment. Kristen also represents X in a licensing and patent dispute against Adeia.

Prior to joining Keker, Van Nest & Peters, Kristen served as a law clerk to Judge Sharon Prost of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. She also served as a law clerk to Judge Edward Davila of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and as the patent law clerk to Judge Davila, Judge Lucy Koh, and Judge Beth Freeman. Kristen earned her J.D. from Columbia Law School, her master’s in computer science from Harvard University, and her A.B. cum laude in electrical and computer engineering from Harvard. 

Before law school, Kristen worked for several years in the Windows Division at Microsoft, where she led a team of development and test engineers to enhance application compatibility tools.

Kristen Lovin represents clients in high-stakes litigation encompassing a broad range of intellectual property, data privacy, and licensing disputes. She leverages her computer science and electrical engineering background and over a decade of litigation experience to develop winning liability strategies that are rooted in a deep understanding of her clients’ technology and business. She has litigated cases in California, Delaware, Texas, and the ITC, and is registered to practice before the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.

Kristen has been an active member of several Keker trial teams, including representing Ivantis Inc., the maker of a revolutionary eye stent designed to treat glaucoma, in a case brought by competitor Glaukos Corporation alleging infringement of two of Glaukos’ patents. She served on a team defending Varian Medical Systems, a world leader in radiotherapy medical devices for the treatment of cancer, in the District of Delaware against patent-infringement claims brought by Best Medical International. She has also represented Google against an eight-patent case related to voice detection and microphone arrays against Jawbone, and is defending Google in a five-patent case filed by Wildseed Mobile, which accuses pixel phones, YouTube, Google search and ad targeting. Kristen is also defending Netflix, Inc. in multiple patent suits brought by Broadcom, which involve complex video technologies such as entropy encoding, adaptive streaming, and distributed software deployment. Kristen also represents X in a licensing and patent dispute against Adeia.

Prior to joining Keker, Van Nest & Peters, Kristen served as a law clerk to Judge Sharon Prost of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. She also served as a law clerk to Judge Edward Davila of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and as the patent law clerk to Judge Davila, Judge Lucy Koh, and Judge Beth Freeman. Kristen earned her J.D. from Columbia Law School, her master’s in computer science from Harvard University, and her A.B. cum laude in electrical and computer engineering from Harvard. 

Before law school, Kristen worked for several years in the Windows Division at Microsoft, where she led a team of development and test engineers to enhance application compatibility tools.

Keker, Van Nest & Peters, Representing Cities and Counties Across the Nation, Urges the Federal Circuit to Support Transgender Veterans’ Access to Gender-Confirmation Surgery

01/30/2024

Keker, Van Nest & Peters, representing cities and counties across the nation, filed an amicus curiae brief urging the federal circuit to support transgender veterans' access to gender-confirmation surgery. Read more

Keker, Van Nest & Peters Promotes New Partners and Of Counsel

01/18/2024

Keker, Van Nest & Peters is pleased to announce that the firm has elevated associates Andrew Bruns, Cody Gray, Maya James, Christina Lee, and Franco Muzzio to Partner, Kristen Lovin to Of Counsel and Senior IP & Technology Litigator and Hamilton Jordan to Of Counsel, effective January 1, 2024. This class marks the largest group of associates promoted to partner since the firm was founded in 1978. Read more

A Tale of 2 Trials: How These Defense Teams Notched Rare Class Action Verdicts

March 01, 2019

Keker, Van Nest & Peters scored a defense verdict in California this month in the rarest of trials: class actions. Read more

Public Storage Class Kicks Off $100M Trial Over Insurance

January 28, 2019

Public Storage bamboozled storage space renters into believing they were required to buy company provided insurance in order to rent units, customers testified Monday at the start of a class action bench trial in California seeking $100 million in restitution from the national storage giant. Read more