image description

Julia Greenberg represents clients in high-stakes complex litigation with a focus on commercial and intellectual property disputes for entertainment and technology companies. She has experience representing clients in state and federal courts, at trial and appellate levels, and in arbitration.

In recent cases, Julia has achieved successful outcomes for clients at all stages of litigation. In 2024, she defended a cybersecurity company against fraud and warranty claims that sought hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. During trial, she argued and won a motion to keep more than $20 million in potential prejudgment interest from reaching the jury. The case ended with a complete defense verdict. In another recent high-profile win, she helped Netflix defeat sprawling infringement claims through tenacious and creative motions practice. In particular, Julia argued a Section 101 motion that invalidated one of the 12 patents in the case.

Julia also maintains an active pro bono practice. She is part of the team working with the ACLU in a putative class action against the Department of Homeland Security and Customs & Border Patrol, winning provisional class certification and a preliminary injunction against the government’s unlawful arrest and detention practices in the Eastern District of California. She also represents individuals in a range of civil and criminal proceedings, from securing a restraining order to petitioning to vacate a murder conviction.

Julia served as a law clerk to Judge Scott M. Matheson, Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. She earned her J.D. from Stanford Law School and her B.A. in Philosophy from the University of Chicago. Before becoming a lawyer, Julia worked as a journalist in New York and San Francisco. 

 

Julia Greenberg represents clients in high-stakes complex litigation with a focus on commercial and intellectual property disputes for entertainment and technology companies. She has experience representing clients in state and federal courts, at trial and appellate levels, and in arbitration.

In recent cases, Julia has achieved successful outcomes for clients at all stages of litigation. In 2024, she defended a cybersecurity company against fraud and warranty claims that sought hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. During trial, she argued and won a motion to keep more than $20 million in potential prejudgment interest from reaching the jury. The case ended with a complete defense verdict. In another recent high-profile win, she helped Netflix defeat sprawling infringement claims through tenacious and creative motions practice. In particular, Julia argued a Section 101 motion that invalidated one of the 12 patents in the case.

Julia also maintains an active pro bono practice. She is part of the team working with the ACLU in a putative class action against the Department of Homeland Security and Customs & Border Patrol, winning provisional class certification and a preliminary injunction against the government’s unlawful arrest and detention practices in the Eastern District of California. She also represents individuals in a range of civil and criminal proceedings, from securing a restraining order to petitioning to vacate a murder conviction.

Julia served as a law clerk to Judge Scott M. Matheson, Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. She earned her J.D. from Stanford Law School and her B.A. in Philosophy from the University of Chicago. Before becoming a lawyer, Julia worked as a journalist in New York and San Francisco. 

 

Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction to Curb Border Patrol's Warrantless Arrests in California

4/29/2025

A federal judge in California issued a preliminary injunction Tuesday requiring the Border Patrol to honor laws regarding reasonable suspicion and probable cause in the wake of a January operation that saw agents make scores of warrantless arrests in and around Bakersfield. Several media outlets reported on the judge’s order. Read more

U.S. District Court Bars Border Patrol’s Unlawful Stop-and-Arrest Practices

04/29/2025

In a win for civil rights amid the Trump administration’s mass deportation campaign, a federal district court in California issued a preliminary injunction barring U.S. Border Patrol from using stop-and-arrest practices that violate federal law and the U.S. Constitution. Keker, Van Nest & Peters and the ACLU argued the successful motion on behalf of the United Farm Workers and plaintiffs. Read more

Keker and ACLU Seek Class Action Over January Raid by Border Patrol in Central California

02/28/2025

The suit alleges “Operation Return to Sender” was a fishing expedition that indiscriminately targeted scores of residents, including U.S. citizens, through racial profiling. Read more

Law360 Trials Group Of The Year: Keker, Van Nest & Peters

02/18/2025

Keker, Van Nest & Peters partners Bob Van Nest, Sharif Jacob, Sophie Hood and Ryan Wong reflect on the firm’s biggest trial wins which earned its place among Law360’s 2024 Trials Groups of the Year. Read more

Pro Bono Showcase: Keker Pursues Justice with Felony Murder Resentencing Project

10/24/2024

In celebration of National Pro Bono Week, we highlight the firm’s Felony Murder Resentencing Project, which has helped at least six incarcerated individuals overturn their life sentences. Read more