Julia Greenberg represents clients in high-stakes complex litigation with a focus on commercial and intellectual property disputes for entertainment and technology companies. She has experience representing clients in state and federal courts, at trial and appellate levels, and in arbitration.
In recent cases, Julia has achieved successful outcomes for clients at all stages of litigation. In 2024, she defended a cybersecurity company against fraud and warranty claims that sought hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. During trial, she argued and won a motion to keep more than $20 million in potential prejudgment interest from reaching the jury. The case ended with a complete defense verdict. In another recent high-profile win, she helped Netflix defeat sprawling infringement claims through tenacious and creative motions practice. In particular, Julia argued a Section 101 motion that invalidated one of the 12 patents in the case.
Julia also maintains an active pro bono practice. She is part of the team working with the ACLU in a putative class action against the Department of Homeland Security and Customs & Border Patrol, winning provisional class certification and a preliminary injunction against the government’s unlawful arrest and detention practices in the Eastern District of California. She also represents individuals in a range of civil and criminal proceedings, from securing a restraining order to petitioning to vacate a murder conviction.
Julia served as a law clerk to Judge Scott M. Matheson, Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. She earned her J.D. from Stanford Law School and her B.A. in Philosophy from the University of Chicago. Before becoming a lawyer, Julia worked as a journalist in New York and San Francisco.
Alorica, Inc. v. Fortinet, Inc.
We represented secure networking company Fortinet, winning a complete defense verdict after a four-week jury trial in Santa Clara Superior Court where plaintiff Alorica sought compensatory damages of more than $200 million, plus additional enhancements for punitive damages. The jury found that Fortinet was not liable on Alorica’s claims of fraud and breach of warranty. KVP was retained a few months before the trial date, and in short order the defense team obtained several favorable pretrial rulings. Prior to the jury verdict, the KVP team also obtained directed verdicts on punitive damages and plaintiff’s largest claim for compensatory damages.
Broadcom v. Netflix
We defended Netflix against a 12-patent case Broadcom filed in the Central District of California. After transferring the case to the Northern District of California, we successfully invalidated 9 patents in the district court or through inter partes review. Broadcom agreed to dismiss the remaining three patents, and the Court entered judgment in favor of Netflix.
Runway AI Copyright Litigation
Defending generative AI platform Runway in copyright lawsuit filed by illustrators and visual artists alleging use of their works to train image models amounts to copyright infringement. Successfully narrowed the case through motion practice to eliminate claims under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act and California state law claims.
United Farm Workers et al. v. Department of Homeland Security
We serve as co-counsel with the ACLU foundations of California in a putative class action challenging unlawful immigration enforcement practices by the U.S. Border Patrol in Kern County. The lawsuit alleges that dozens of long-term county residents were seized in warrantless arrests—based on skin color and appearance—and coerced into “voluntary” deportations without due process in an operation carried out 300 miles from the border. A U.S. District Court issued a preliminary injunction requiring federal agents to comply with constitutional standards of reasonable suspicion and probable cause when apprehending people.
CoStar v. CREXi
We are representing Commercial Real Estate Exchange, Inc. (CREXi), a fast-growing commercial real estate marketplace, against a copyright and unfair competition lawsuit brought by industry giant CoStar and in a countersuit that alleges monopolistic conduct by CoStar.
San Diego County Water Authority v. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
For more than a decade, we have represented the San Diego County Water Authority in litigation against the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), the regional water wholesaler for most of Southern California. We have led them through three separate trials, and represented them in three separate appeals, resulting in more than $100 million in recovered damages, interest and attorneys’ fees, plus legal victories that have provided more than $1 billion in long-term benefit to the Water Authority.
4/29/2025
A federal judge in California issued a preliminary injunction Tuesday requiring the Border Patrol to honor laws regarding reasonable suspicion and probable cause in the wake of a January operation that saw agents make scores of warrantless arrests in and around Bakersfield. Several media outlets reported on the judge’s order. Read more
04/29/2025
In a win for civil rights amid the Trump administration’s mass deportation campaign, a federal district court in California issued a preliminary injunction barring U.S. Border Patrol from using stop-and-arrest practices that violate federal law and the U.S. Constitution. Keker, Van Nest & Peters and the ACLU argued the successful motion on behalf of the United Farm Workers and plaintiffs. Read more
02/28/2025
The suit alleges “Operation Return to Sender” was a fishing expedition that indiscriminately targeted scores of residents, including U.S. citizens, through racial profiling. Read more
02/18/2025
Keker, Van Nest & Peters partners Bob Van Nest, Sharif Jacob, Sophie Hood and Ryan Wong reflect on the firm’s biggest trial wins which earned its place among Law360’s 2024 Trials Groups of the Year. Read more
10/24/2024
In celebration of National Pro Bono Week, we highlight the firm’s Felony Murder Resentencing Project, which has helped at least six incarcerated individuals overturn their life sentences. Read more