Katie Lynn Joyce

Partner

She/her/hers

Katie Lynn Joyce

Partner

She/her/hers

Katie Lynn Joyce represents clients in high-stakes civil litigation and criminal defense. Her experience includes patent, trade secret, and other intellectual property cases; fiduciary duty and breach of contract disputes; and white-collar criminal defense. She has represented plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal courts, as well as in arbitration. Katie Lynn has also played key roles on multiple trial teams, including one that secured the recovery of a multi-million dollar award, in addition to attorneys’ fees, for former shareholders of a tech company. 

Prior to joining Keker, Van Nest & Peters, Katie Lynn served as a law clerk to Judge Richard A. Paez of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and Judge Christina Reiss of the U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont. Katie Lynn earned her J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, and graduated from Washington University in St. Louis with a B.A. in anthropology. 

Cases of Note

  • CoStar v. CREXi

    We represented Commercial Real Estate Exchange, Inc. (CREXi), a fast-growing online commercial real estate marketplace, in competitor litigation against industry giant CoStar. After CoStar filed a complaint against CREXi alleging…

  • Broadcom v. Netflix

    We defended Netflix against a 12-patent case Broadcom filed in the Central District of California. After transferring the case to the Northern District of California, we successfully invalidated 9 patents…

  • SRS Acquiom, Inc. v. PNC Bank et al.

    We represented software innovator SRS Acquiom in a trade-secrets misappropriation case against PNC Bank and two former SRS employees, alleging that the employees improperly retained SRS confidential information and used…

  • AlmondNet v. FreeWheel Media

    We are defending Comcast subsidiaries FreeWheel Media and Beeswax.io against infringement claims based on patents directed to targeted advertising brought by AlmondNet in the District of Delaware.

  • Jenam Tech v. Google

    We defended Google against a series of patent cases alleging that Google’s network protocol infringes Jenam’s patents. A three-judge Federal Circuit panel ordered the district court to transfer the case…

  • Symantec v. Zscaler

    We represented Zscaler in parallel infringement suits brought by Symantec in the District of Delaware asserting 14 patents against Zscaler’s network-security platform. We succeeded in transferring both cases to the…

  • United States v. Christopher Lischewski

    We defended the former CEO of Bumble Bee Foods in a five-week jury trial in the Northern District of California against charges that he conspired to fix prices of canned…

News & Events

Publications & Presentations

  • “The Patent Playbook: Trends to Watch and Issues to Know,” Keker, Van Nest & Peters CLE Annual Workshop, March 2026 
  • “Patent Litigation for Non-Engineers,” Berkeley Center for Law & Technology, March 2019.
  • “Stars, Dragons, and the Letter ‘M’: Consequential Symbols in California Prison Gang Policy,” 104 CALIF. L. REV. 733, June 2016