We successfully defended Google against patent claims brought in the Northern District of California by LookSmart, which targeted Google’s search technology. The court dismissed the case, finding the patent was abstract under Section 101.

We are defending Google against a five-patent case brought by Daedalus Prime in the Western District of Texas targeting alleged power-management functionalities in Google’s Tensor system-on-chip products and Axion processors.

We defended Dexcom in the District of Delaware where Abbott asserted a dozen patents targeting Dexcom’s G6 continuous glucose monitoring technology. The Keker team narrowed the case to four patents prior to trial, including by invalidating an Abbott patent at summary judgment, and excluded Abbott’s expert testimony regarding reasonable royalty damages. Following a two-week trial, the jury invalidated another Abbott patent and found two were not infringed. The Court also declined to let the jury consider damages on the remaining patent, cementing a defense victory for the Keker trial team.

We are defending Google in a series of patent cases brought by EcoFactor targeting Google’s Nest products, which are pending in the Northern District of California, which have been stayed pending inter partes review proceedings before the PTAB. We previously defended Google at trial in the Western District of Texas against patent claims brought by EcoFactor that involved four asserted patents, one of which EcoFactor dropped, and another of which we invalidated before trial. Two remaining patents proceeded to trial before Judge Albright. We obtained a jury verdict of non-infringement on one patent, and although the jury found one claim of the other infringed, we limited damages and eliminated running royalties.

We are defending Google in a five-patent case brought by Wildseed Mobile in the Northern District of California that accused multiple Google products ranging from YouTube to Google Workspace applications of infringement. We successfully transferred the case, originally filed in Texas, to California and then invalidated three patents on Section 101 grounds. The two remaining patents were subject to complete or partial invalidation at the PTAB.